12164 | Request for funds to compensate additional development work in ‘v3.4.0’ upgrade.
2 min read
301 words
233 views
Source from:
- https://station.terraclassic.community/proposal/columbus-5/12164
- https://validator.info/terra-classic/governance/12164
Additional Funding Request for IBC Unfork & Security Patches Work
This proposal seeks validator and community approval for an additional $2,000 USD to compensate for extra development efforts included in the `v3.4.0` software upgrade.
Proposal Link: https://station.terraclassic.community/proposal/columbus-5/12157
These additional efforts included:
- Security Patch Application: Applied security patches for WasmVM and CometBFT – [PR #549](https://github.com/classic-terra/core/pull/549)
- IBC Unforking: Upgraded ibc-go to v7.4.1 for improved interoperability – [PR #28](https://github.com/orbitorg/core/pull/28)
- Extra Development & Testing: Additional effort was required to test locally and on testnet to ensure a successful and stable upgrade before deployment.
Justification for Additional Funding
- These changes were not originally included in the Phase 1 budget but were necessary to improve security and IBC compatibility for Terra Classic.
- The additional engineering effort was critical for maintaining a secure and reliable chain.
- A total of $2,000 USD is a fair and reasonable cost for this extra scope of work.
๐ Reference: [Original Proposal Discussion](https://common.xyz/terra-luna-classic-lunc/discussion/24923-proposal-removal-of-forked-modules-from-terra-classic)
Funding Details
- Total requested amount: $2,000 USD (to be converted to LUNC at the time of submission).
- Purpose: Compensation for development, testing, and implementation of security patches and IBC improvements.
Call to Action
- Vote YES: Support compensating the additional work done to enhance the **security and interoperability** of Terra Classic.
- Vote NO: Reject this additional funding request.
Authors:[OrbitLabs]
Proposal forum URL:https://common.xyz/terra-luna-classic-lunc/discussion/24923-proposal-removal-of-forked-modules-from-terra-classic
Votes options context:
- Yes: Support compensating the additional work done to enhance the security and interoperability of Terra Classic.
- No: Reject this additional funding request.
- Abstain: You have no strong opinion and will accept the decision of the majority.
- No with veto: You believe this proposal is harmful and should not be implemented.
Was this article helpful?
YesNo

