12146 | BLV Labs’s Community Spend Proposal

Validator.info: Terra Classic (LUNC) Governance — Validator Info
Galaxy Station: Galaxy Station

BLV Labs’s Community Spend Proposal

BLV Labs’s first proposal was approved by the community to improve the GOV module, the proposal link is here:

https://station.terraclassic.community/proposal/columbus-5/12137

As promised, we dedicated our four weeks of effort to complete the work, with the code pushed to GitHub and a pull request created on the Classic Terra repository. After that, we continued to work on all the bugs related to testing and integration, you can check our commitments at the public link here:

https://github.com/classic-terra/core/pull/529

When submitting our PR to the main repo, we received a lot of feedback from the community and listened to the community’s suggestions to complete the whole feature.

We (BLV labs) have also added a clear technical documentation here, so that everyone can easily understand these new updates:

https://github.com/BLV-Labs/core/blob/blv-labs/optimize-calculation-deposit-gov-v8.4/custom/gov/README.md

The community can check out the whole our work here:

https://hackmd.io/@b5PzZtmhSPGXn6o0jmZqYg/BJoKKW6Wyx

As completed all the work we mentioned in our first proposal, we created this community spending proposal for the work we have undertaken.

The cost of these works, as referred in #12137 is $5000 (to be paid in LUNC from the community pool at current exchange rate: 42337000 LUNC)

Market price of Lunc at the time of this proposal: $0.0001181/LUNC

Future plan

As this first proposal is completely finished, we (BLV Labs) will continue to propose the next plans related to: EVM, SDK50 upgrade, or IBC improvement…

Learning from this proposal, we will provide Tech spec for the community to comment before choosing the implementation plan.

Vote Options:

• Vote Yes if you are satisfied with our efforts and agree to fund BLV Labs.
• Vote No if you are not satisfied with our work and disagree with funding us on LUNC.
• Vote No With Veto if you see this proposal as spam or harmful to the chain.
• Vote Abstain if you simply want to contribute to the quorum.